← Back to Ecosystem

GARM Neural Vault

🛡 PERIMETER DEFENSE · ACTIVE
🏆 EEC 2026 · TOP 80 EUROPE · DEEP TECH
European Economic Congress · Katowice 2026 · Deep Tech Track

Neural RAM Vault & Micro-Hypervisor · Hardware-Level GPU-Accelerated Isolation

Engineered for HFT firms and defense contractors. GARM isolates critical applications in RAM and physically destroys compromised data in under 100 milliseconds. Hardware-level security that software cannot bypass.

<100ms Rapid Lockout
Hardware Kernel Level
12ms Face Tracking
AES-256 RAM Encryption
GARM Investment Brief
BOOTSTRAPPED · PRE-INSTITUTIONAL
$42B
Total Addressable Market (TAM)
$8.7B
Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)
$65M
Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)
Enterprise SaaS &
HSM Licensing
Revenue Model
$150K–$250K
Pre-Seed Target
MVP Complete
Current Development Stage
$25M–$45M
Upside Scenario
Q3 2026
Pre-Seed Target Window

GARM is a hardware-isolated Neural RAM Vault with a GPU-accelerated biometric hypervisor. FIPS 140-3 assessment pathway initiated Q4 2026. Planned pre-seed capital would fund FIPS compliance audits and early corporate pilot scaling.

Request Brief →
// Recognition & Awards

European Economic Congress Top 80 Europe

GARM was selected among the Top 80 European deep-tech startups at the European Economic Congress 2026 in Katowice — one of Europe's most prestigious technology innovation showcases.

GARM EEC 2026 Top 80 Certificate
// What It Means

The EEC Startup Review evaluates ventures across Europe on technical innovation, market potential, and execution quality. GARM's selection validates our approach to hardware-level AI security as a category-defining technology.

Top 80
Europe 2026
Deep Tech
Track
Katowice
Poland
2026
Edition
🏆 View Official EEC Profile →
// What Changes For You

From Hoping Your Data Is Safe to Knowing It's Untouchable

GARM is positioned for high-assurance local protection around sensitive data and critical workflows. The investor case is not a promise of invulnerability; it is a testable architecture built around local control, post-quantum design, hardware-bound access, and reduced cloud dependency.

🧘
Peace of Mind
Emergency lockout can clear volatile keys quickly; recoverability should be validated through independent testing.
🔒
Hardware-Bound Assurance
Deep isolation reduces OS-level exposure and creates a stronger boundary around sensitive workloads.
👑
True Ownership
Your data governance stays local, policy-controlled, and auditable instead of cloud-dependent.

Why GARM? The product thesis combines isolation, local AI monitoring, and volatile-memory workflows in one security layer. Why now? Breach costs, NIS2/DORA pressure, and post-quantum migration are pushing security decisions upward. Why this investment? The diligence question is whether GARM can turn this architecture into verified pilots, audits, and recurring security spend.

// Security Modules

Trust Capabilities

Four hardened subsystems forming a zero-trust perimeter around critical applications and data.

🔒

RAM Vault & Memory Scrambler

Hardware Hypervisor · Ultra-Low Latency

A hardware-level micro-hypervisor isolates dedicated memory pools with AES-256 encryption applied at the hardware boundary. Continuously randomizes memory layout using native memory primitives eliminating cold boot attacks, DMA exploits, and kernel-level memory scraping.

AES-256 Encryption
Native Zero-Copy Core
Isolation Isolation Level
👁

Ghost UI (Anti-Screen-Capture)

DirectX 12 VRAM Rendering · Invisible to OS

Renders the entire user interface exclusively in GPU VRAM via DirectX 12, bypassing standard OS compositing. The application is completely invisible to screen capture APIs, spyware, remote desktop tools, and shoulder surfing. Only the physical display output shows the UI.

DX12 Render Pipeline
0 Screen Capture Vectors
VRAM Only
📡

Sentinel AI Biometrics

NVIDIA GPU · Neural Fingerprinting

Runs locally on NVIDIA GPUs to perform continuous 12ms face detection, eye tracking, and attention analysis. Keystroke stylometry creates a neural fingerprint unique to each authorized operator detecting unauthorized users even if they have valid credentials.

12ms Detection Latency
Local GPU Processing
Bio Neural Fingerprint

Rapid Lockout Protocol

Volatile Memory Sealing · Hardware Level

Volatile key clearing triggered by unauthorized faces, unknown USB devices, network anomalies, or manual dead-man switch. Cryptographic keys are zeroed, memory pools overwritten with noise, and volatile state irreversibly destroyed.

<100ms Wipe Time
Hardware Trigger Level
Irreversible Lockout
// Strategic Defense

Hostile Environment Defense

Institutional-grade resilience for banking and national security sectors.

🛡️

Anti-EDR & Kernel Panic Resilience

Standard EDRs cause billion-dollar outages. GARM's Deep isolation acts as an insurance policy, maintaining data sovereignty even if the host OS is completely compromised.

🧨

Physical Theft Lockout

Hardware-lock combined with an accelerometer trigger. If the device is violently yanked or stolen, encrypted sessions can be locked and volatile keys cleared under policy.

🕵️

Private Local Mode

The vault is designed to reduce exposure to standard OS-level capture and inspection surfaces while keeping validation requirements explicit.

🧿

Hardware-Lock

Cryptographic binding to unique silicon ID (TPM/HSM), preventing cloning, unauthorized migration, or execution on unrecognized hardware environments.

// Decision Architecture

GARM Decision Architecture

From biometric verification to emergency lockout, every step is protected at the hardware level.

01 // INPUT
Biometric Scan
Face ID • Eye Track • Bio-Salt
02 // VERIFY
Identity Verification
Keystroke Stylometry • Behavioral AI
03 // THREAT
Threat Analysis
Anomaly Detection • Real-time Scoring
VAULT_ENGINE_V3

GARM CORE

RING_0_LOCKED // SENTINEL_ACTIVE
04 // ISOLATE
Isolation Engine
Hardware Hypervisor • RAM Cage
05 // ENCRYPT
Vault Encrypt
AES-256 • Memory Scramble
06 // FINAL_GATE
Ghost UI Render
DirectX 12 VRAM • Zero Capture
EXECUTION_LOG
SYSTEM_IDLE // AWAITING_BIOMETRIC_INPUT
// Deployment Trajectory

Deployment Roadmap

Phased hardening schedule. Each phase extends the security perimeter.

I

Kernel Hypervisor & RAM Vault

Core Isolation Layer

Deploy hardware-level micro-hypervisor with native memory isolation. AES-256 encrypted RAM pools with continuous address space randomization. Cold boot and DMA attack mitigation.

II

Ghost UI DirectX 12 Interop

Visual Security Layer

Implement VRAM-exclusive rendering pipeline bypassing OS compositor. Anti-screen-capture hardening across all Windows compositing APIs. Secure UI overlay for operator authentication flows.

III

Sentinel AI Biometrics

Neural Authentication Layer

Deploy face tracking and keystroke stylometry on local NVIDIA GPUs. Build neural fingerprint database with continuous learning. Integrate rapid lockout triggers with biometric anomaly detection.

IV

Enterprise Management Console

FIPS 140-2 Certification Prep

Central management dashboard for multi-node deployments. Policy engine for biometric thresholds and wipe conditions. Compliance documentation and audit logging for FIPS 140-2 Level 3.

When Encryption Fails Empires Fall

Every major data breach in history shares a common thread: conventional storage trusts the wrong layers. GARM trusts nothing.

🏛️
Equifax Breach
September 2017 USA
147M RECORDS
Social Security Numbers, Financials Exposed
Unpatched Apache Struts server became an open door. Data was stored on disk in accessible databases. Once inside the perimeter, the attackers had unlimited access to persistent storage.
[ HOVER FOR COUNTERMEASURE → ]
✦ GARM DATA PROTECTION PROTOCOL
RAM-Only Virtual File System
GARM never writes data to disk. All files exist exclusively in AES-512 encrypted RAM pools with continuous address randomization. If the system loses power, the data ceases to exist. There is no disk to clone, no database to export. Physical seizure yields materially less recoverable data when the architecture is implemented correctly.
🛡 ZERO PERSISTENT STORAGE
🕵️
WikiLeaks Vault 7
March 2017 CIA
8,761 DOCUMENTS
Entire Cyber Arsenal Exposed
Sensitive cyber tools leaked. The tools exploited OS compositing and screen capture APIs. Every application rendering through the OS-managed framebuffer was vulnerable to silent screenshot extraction.
[ HOVER FOR COUNTERMEASURE → ]
✦ GARM DATA PROTECTION PROTOCOL
Ghost UI VRAM-Only Rendering
GARM's DirectX 12 Ghost UI renders directly to VRAM, bypassing the OS compositor entirely. Screenshot tools, screen recording, remote desktop, and DWM capture hooks see only a black rectangle. The visual data never enters system memory.
👻 ANTI-CAPTURE DISPLAY
📱
Samsung Knox Bypass
2019-2022 Multiple CVEs
ENTERPRISE SECRETS
"Secure" Container Proven Vulnerable
Samsung Knox, marketed as a "defense-grade" secure container, was repeatedly bypassed through kernel exploits. Biometric authentication relied on software validation only no hardware-bound cryptographic challenge.
[ HOVER FOR COUNTERMEASURE → ]
✦ GARM DATA PROTECTION PROTOCOL
Sentinel AI + Hardware-Bound Biometrics
GARM's AI Sentinel runs face-tracking and keystroke stylometry on local NVIDIA GPUs. The biometric challenge is hardware-bound no software-bypass risk. Anomaly detection can trigger rapid lockout and volatile key clearing under policy. The neural fingerprint continuously learns your unique patterns.
🧠 NEURAL BIOMETRIC VAULT
🌐
SolarWinds SUNBURST
December 2020 Global
18,000 ORGS COMPROMISED
Pentagon, Treasury, Fortune 500
Supply chain attack injected malicious code into a trusted software update. The backdoor operated undetected for 9+ months inside US government networks, exfiltrating data through DNS tunneling.
[ HOVER FOR COUNTERMEASURE → ]
✦ GARM DATA PROTECTION PROTOCOL
Zero-Trust Isolation Architecture
GARM operates within a hardware-level micro-hypervisor with native memory isolation. No external updates. No network dependencies. No supply chain. The system is air-gapped by design, narrowing exposure to software-distribution attacks and untrusted update paths.
🔒 AIR-GAPPED BY DESIGN
AES-512
Encryption Standard
200ms
Rapid Lockout Target
Hardware
Hypervisor Isolation
$11B
Data Loss Prevention TAM

Four Isolation Layers. Reduced Attack Surface.

Every layer operates independently. Breaching one grants access to nothing. No cloud. No updates. No trust.

⚙️
Kernel Layer
Native Micro-Hypervisor (Hardware)
Hardware-level memory isolation. Encrypted RAM pools with continuous address randomization. Cold boot and DMA attack mitigation.
💾
Storage Layer
RAM-Only VFS + AES-512 + Argon2id
No intentional persistent storage. All files in encrypted RAM. Argon2id key derivation with 19 GPU-resistant rounds.
🖥️
Display Layer
DirectX 12 Ghost UI (VRAM Pipeline)
Bypasses OS compositor. Anti-screenshot, anti-recording, anti-remote-desktop. Only operator's physical eyes see the data.
👁️
Biometric Layer
NVIDIA TensorRT + Face Track + Keystroke ML
Local GPU neural authentication. Continuous identity verification. Anomaly triggers rapid lockout.
🔐
Cryptography Layer
Post-Quantum Kyber-1024 + Dilithium
Future-proof against quantum computing. Lattice-based cryptography immune to Shor's algorithm.
🏢
Enterprise Layer
FIPS 140-2 Level 3 Compliance Engine
Central management console. Multi-node deployment. Audit logging and compliance documentation.

Fortify Your Perimeter

GARM is available exclusively to defense contractors and HFT trading desks.

Request Security Clearance
THREAT LANDSCAPE

What Happens Without GARM

$4.45M
Average Data Breach Cost
IBM Security Report 2024
277
Days to Detect a Breach
Average across all industries
Hardware-Level
GARM Protection Level
Hardware-level isolation
0
Data Extractable
Even with physical access

📉 Average Data Breach Cost Trend

$3.86M
2020
$4.24M
2021
$4.35M
2022
$4.45M
2023
$4.88M
2024
Founder-funded
GARM

IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report GARM makes breaches extractionless.

🛡️ Attack Vectors GARM Neutralizes

Stolen Credentials✅ Blocked
Hardware vault creds never in RAM
Ransomware / Malware✅ Blocked
VRAM isolation OS can't touch data
Physical Extraction✅ Blocked
Lockout + GPU-assisted decryption
State-Level Forensics✅ Blocked
Steganographic + plausible deniability

Device Vulnerabilities vs. GARM Solutions

💼 Executives & Asset Custodians

PROBLEM

Standard operating systems (iOS, Android, Windows) are bloated with telemetrics and backdoors. A single zero-click exploit or malicious physical access at an airport border can extract cryptographic keys, corporate secrets, and personal communications.

💼 Executives & Asset Custodians

GARM SOLUTION

True Physical Segregation. GARM boots from a integrity-verified, read-only external drive. It minimizes host-machine trace under the proposed operating model. If physically seized, the plausible deniability protocol activates, making the hidden encrypted volumes difficult to distinguish from random noise under the proposed deniability model.

📰 Investigative Journalists & Dissidents

PROBLEM

Traveling with sensitive data across hostile borders relies on "hiding" folders or using commercial VPNs that log traffic. State-sponsored actors possess forensic tools that map commercial encryption structures in minutes.

📰 Investigative Journalists & Dissidents

GARM SOLUTION

Anti-Forensic Architecture. GARM routes all traffic through a multi-hop, heavily obfuscated Tor/I2P overlay. "Panic Mode" wipes the decryption keys from RAM instantly upon device removal or a targeted hotkey, permanently destroying access to the secure container.

🏦 Banks & Financial Institutions

Client data protection at the hardware level. Hardware vault ensures even compromised OS cannot expose sensitive financial records. Regulatory compliance built-in.

🏛️ Government & Intelligence Agencies

Classified document storage with VRAM rendering data never touches RAM. Anti-forensics, GPU-assisted decryption, rapid lockout workflows, and hardware-bound access controls.

🔐 Corporate Security & IP Protection

Protect trade secrets, source code, R&D data. Plausible deniability mode. Steganographic storage. Zero cloud dependency full sovereign control.

Public-Sector Security & Defense Integrators

Field-resilient data protection for controlled environments. Works offline, supports degraded-connectivity operations, and can pair hardware tamper detection with policy-based lockout.

Superiority Matrix

Data Isolation Anti-Forensics Zero-Day Rescue Offline Extraction Hardware ID Biometrics
GARM Protocol
Legacy Solutions

Deployment Tiers

PHASE 01

Solo Executive

$15K
/ yr recurring
  • Single machine Hardware Vault
  • Offline Hardware Drive
  • Standard lockout config
  • Post-Quantum AES-256
STANDARD
PHASE 02

Corporate Board

$120K
/ yr recurring
  • Up to 10 operator nodes
  • Hardware ID binding network
  • Custom Biometric threshold setup
  • 24/7 dedicated support
ENTERPRISE

Data Center Vault

$600K+
/ yr recurring
  • Server-side memory isolation
  • Bare-metal secure deployment
  • Mass Sentinel integration
  • On-premise deployment
CUSTOM R&D

Government / Integrator Custom

POA&M
/ project scope
  • Custom hardware integrations
  • Specific PQC logic (NIST)
  • Advanced steganography
  • Dedicated clearance squad
// INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERSHIP

Deploy GARM Security in Your Enterprise

Organizations requiring enterprise-grade data protection can secure prioritized deployment mapping by submitting a formal partnership document. Demonstrated institutional traction directly dictates feature prioritization and accelerates defense/NVIDIA tech grant validation. We accept three tiers of formal partnership documentation:

Letter of Intent (LOI)

COMMERCIAL COMMITMENT

Official statement of intent to become a primary pilot client upon release. Proves direct market demand and accelerates scale-up. Non-binding but highly influential.

Letter of Support (LoS)

INDUSTRY VALIDATION

Official endorsement of our R&D value for the ecosystem. Crucial for securing top-tier defense tech grants by confirming expert backing.

HIGHEST TIER

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

PRE-CONTRACT PARTNERSHIP

Strategic agreement detailing joint deployment parameters (e.g. testing infrastructure in exchange for tier integration). Bypasses standard wait times.

📧 oleksandr.l@forneus.io

Please send official documents on agency/company letterhead through proper administrative channels.
Include: Organization name, sensitivity classification, deployment scale.
Every submitted document significantly increases our probability of securing deep-tech funding, accelerating the delivery pipeline for your division.

// SECURITY RISK SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED, PRIORITIZED, AND REDUCED BEFORE SCALE.

// DATASHEET

Technical Specifications

KERNEL ACCESS
Hardware-Level
Direct hardware-level VFS isolation
VAULT ENCRYPTION
AES-256-GCM
Hardware-bound key derivation
BIOMETRIC AUTH
Multi-Factor
Face, iris, fingerprint fusion
GPU ACCELERATION
Hardware Accel.
Real-time Argon2id hashing
KEY BINDING
Motherboard UUID
Non-exportable hardware anchor
PANIC WIPE
<200ms
Full memory + disk sanitization
// INTEROPERABILITY

Ecosystem Data Flow

GARM is the security backbone every Forneus Technologies module depends on its vault for data integrity.

GARM → KAIROS

Securely provisions API keys, broker credentials, and strategy parameters to the trading engine. All credentials remain encrypted until the moment of execution.

GARM → PHANES

Manages identity verification, encryption key lifecycle, and end-to-end handshake protocols for PHANES' zero-knowledge messaging layer.

GARM ↔ Authenticator

Bi-directional trust: Authenticator validates user identity; GARM stores the cryptographic proof and manages session tokens across all modules.

// Market Sizing & Milestones · GARM

GARM: TAM/SAM/SOM & Roadmap

Hardware-isolated neural RAM vault for regulated credentials, secrets, and high-risk AI sessions. Founded in 2025, currently bootstrapped, operating in a founder-funded, pre-institutional stage. The figures below are target budgets and milestone assumptions for a first priced round, not announced financing.

Current stageFounder-funded / pre-institutional
Funding windowFrom autumn 2026
Capital disciplineMilestone-based tranches
Investor framingProjection, not guarantee
TAM · Total Addressable Market
$28.7B

Endpoint DLP, hardware security modules, hardware root of trust, and secrets-management infrastructure driven by NIS2, DORA, and post-quantum migration.

SAM · Serviceable Addressable Market
$4.2B

EU finance, defense supply chain, critical manufacturing, legal, and cloud-sensitive enterprise accounts requiring local key custody and auditability.

SOM · Conservative Obtainable Target
$12-18M ARR

120-180 enterprise contracts in 36 months after seed at $80K-$100K ARR, excluding cross-sell into KAIROS and Authenticator.

Market Logic

EU NIS2 18-sector cybersecurity scope; DORA financial ICT resilience; NIST FIPS 203/204/205 post-quantum standards. SOM is calculated as reachable revenue/bookings from a narrow initial segment, not as a percentage fantasy of the whole market.

// Evidence Layer

Why GARM can compound into venture-scale value

GARM sits in a forced security-refresh cycle: NIS2 expands board accountability, DORA pressures financial ICT controls, and NIST post-quantum standards turn cryptographic migration from theory into procurement planning.

18 NIS2 sectors

The European Commission defines NIS2 as a unified cybersecurity framework across 18 critical sectors.

3 NIST PQC standards

NIST finalized FIPS 203, 204, and 205 in August 2024, giving buyers a concrete migration target.

120-180 3-year obtainable accounts

SOM is modeled as regulated EU enterprise accounts with secrets, keys, and identity risk, not the full cybersecurity market.

Regulatory pull90%
PQC timing86%
Enterprise urgency72%
Cross-sell leverage76%
GARM
Market
Proof
Capital
// Funded Milestone Plan

From Bootstrap to Commercial Evidence

2025-Q2 2026 Founder-funded

Bootstrapped MVP

Core vault architecture, biometric access concept, micro-hypervisor boundary, and product proof assets completed without external capital.

Q3 2026 $150K-$250K

Pre-seed target

Threat model, enterprise beta packaging, secure build pipeline, and first controlled deployments with design partners.

Q4 2026 $250K-$400K

Compliance preparation

ISO 27001 implementation plan, FIPS 140-3 pre-assessment, penetration-testing scope, and DORA-aligned audit evidence.

Q2 2027 $750K-$1.2M

Seed target

5-10 regulated pilots, hardened admin console, SLAs, and integrations with Authenticator and KAIROS.

Q4 2027 First ARR

Commercial launch target

General availability, paid regulated customers, certification progress, and Series A readiness from renewal and usage telemetry.

Investor upside case: the company is positioned as a portfolio of deep-tech options. A billion-dollar outcome is only credible if 2-3 products convert pilots into recurring revenue or sovereign contracts. This page presents the milestone evidence required to make that case professionally.
// Investor Operating Plan

GARM: build plan, budget, competition

This section translates the product thesis into salaries, engineering roles, services, equipment, milestones and investor diligence questions.

Role in portfolio

Priority 2: commercialize after VASSAGO because it protects the rest of the portfolio and has MVP/proof assets.

1 Rust/security engineer; 1 Windows/low-level engineer; 1 backend/API engineer; 1 QA/security tester; 0.5 DevOps; founder architecture allocation.

Market pain

What buyers struggle with

Secrets, API keys, client files and operational plans leak through endpoints, screenshots, weak credential storage and unmanaged devices.

Forneus answer

Integrated solution

Local-first secure vault with hardware-bound identity, high-assurance session control, audit trails and portfolio integrations.

18-month budget

$820K-$1.25M

Runway: 15-18 months. Budget assumes non-minimum European startup salaries, paid AI/dev services, equipment, legal/compliance and pilot support.

Team payroll

Engineering/product salaries including founders and research leadership

Equipment/services

Hardware, cloud, AI subscriptions, security tools, data and testing services

Validation

Legal, audit, safety, pilot, travel and partner diligence budget

Go-to-market

Design partners, procurement materials, documentation and sales support

$820K-$1.25M
staged
needed
// Detailed Roadmap

Milestones investors can price

Q4 2026$260K

MVP hardening, enterprise install path and VASSAGO document vault integration

Q1 2027$240K

Pilot builds for 3-5 finance/legal/security teams, audit logs, incident response model

Q2 2027$210K

External penetration test, SOC2/ISO control mapping, signed design-partner feedback

Q3-Q4 2027$220K

Paid pilot conversion, admin console, channel partner materials

// Competitive Field

Competitors and wedge

1Password/Bitwarden

Competes on trust, procurement maturity and distribution; Forneus wedge is portfolio-native integration and focused buyer workflow.

HashiCorp Vault

Competes on trust, procurement maturity and distribution; Forneus wedge is portfolio-native integration and focused buyer workflow.

YubiKey/HSM vendors

Competes on trust, procurement maturity and distribution; Forneus wedge is portfolio-native integration and focused buyer workflow.

CrowdStrike/EDR

Competes on trust, procurement maturity and distribution; Forneus wedge is portfolio-native integration and focused buyer workflow.

// Ecosystem Fit

How GARM compounds with the stack

// Institutional Access

Request the GARM diligence package

We share technical evidence, roadmap assumptions, and funding use-of-proceeds under qualified investor or strategic partner access.

Request Access
// Execution Roadmap

GARM roadmap

A staged path for threat intelligence and response, sequenced around validation, trust controls, partner readiness, and capital discipline.

Current stage

MVP - first commercial priority

Product
76%
Trust
84%
Partner
64%
Funding
72%
Milestones
  1. 2026 Q3: stabilize MVP ingestion, analyst dashboard, alert triage, and source reliability scoring.
  2. 2026 Q4: validate with a controlled group of security operators using incident review, false-positive, and response-time metrics.
  3. 2027 Q1: add reporting packs for executives and technical teams, including trend narratives and recommended actions.
  4. 2027 Q2: prepare paid pilots with SOC-friendly workflows, export formats, and basic API handoff for partner environments.
  5. 2027 Q3-Q4: expand coverage for priority sectors and regional threat patterns while keeping source provenance visible.
  6. 2028: introduce automated enrichment, playbook suggestions, and partner integration tracks for managed security providers.
  7. 2029: mature toward a trusted intelligence layer for the Forneus ecosystem and selected external customers.
Readiness mix

Intelligence readiness

Product maturityTrust controlsPartner motionFunding dependency

Security trust path keeps the next release decision tied to evidence rather than broad unfocused spending.